Skip to content
clickidy
๐ŸŽฏ ALL GAMES
ASIAFlag of Laos

Laos

The only landlocked country in Southeast Asia, Laos moves at the pace of the Mekong and keeps thousands of Buddhist temples humming. Luang Prabang wakes to a daily procession of saffron-robed monks.

WHAT THE FLAG MEANSย โ—ข

Three horizontal bands of red, dark blue and red, the blue one double-width and bearing a white moon at the centre. Article 115 of the constitution as revised in 2025 calls the white shape a moon, fixes the flag's height at two thirds of its width, each red edge at half the height of the dark blue field and the moon at four fifths of it, and assigns none of them a meaning. The readings of red as the blood shed for independence, of the blue as the Mekong and of the moon as unity or as the full moon over the river are conventional rather than the constitution's.

Source: laoofficialgazette.gov.la ยท checked 2026-08-26

Laos FACTSย โ—ข

CapitalVientiane
ContinentAsia
Population7,873,046 (2025)
Area236,800 kmยฒ
Population density33/kmยฒ
CurrencyLao kip (LAK)
Official languageLao
Calling code+856
Internet TLD.la
Time zoneUTC+07:00
Drives on theRight
ISO codesLA / LAO

DID YOU KNOW?ย โ—ข

  • It's the only landlocked nation in Southeast Asia.
  • The Mekong River runs almost the entire length of the country, shaping its farms and cities.
  • The Plain of Jars is dotted with thousands of ancient stone jars whose purpose is still debated.
  • Luang Prabang, a former royal capital, is renowned for its temples and dawn alms-giving ritual.

Laos QUICK ANSWERSย โ—ข

What is the capital of Laos?

The capital of Laos is Vientiane.

What is the population of Laos?

Laos had a population of 7,873,046 in 2025.

What currency does Laos use?

Laos uses the Lao kip (LAK).

What languages are spoken in Laos?

The official language of Laos is Lao.

Think you know your flags? Play Flag Daily โ†’ ยท Browse all countries โ†’

MORE ON THE FLAGย โ—ข

Most accounts of the Lao flag will tell you the red is blood, the blue is the Mekong and the white circle is the full moon over the river. Laos itself says none of that.

The country's flag is described in one article of its constitution. That article names the parts, fixes three proportions, and stops. It attaches no meaning to the red, no meaning to the blue and no meaning to the moon, and it has attached none of them since the first Lao constitution was promulgated in 1991.

What it does do is move. The provision has been numbered Article 77, Article 91, Article 112 and, since March 2025, Article 115, while its wording has barely shifted. So a source citing this provision may give any of four numbers for it.

Key Takeaways

  • The flag provision is Article 115 of the constitution as revised in 2025. Before 22 March 2025 it was Article 112.
  • The wording has been carried forward almost unchanged through four constitutional texts, and no version assigns any element a meaning.
  • The Lao word for the white circle is เบงเบปเบ‡เป€เบ”เบทเบญเบ™, glossed in the SEAlang Library Lao Dictionary simply as "moon".
  • The National Congress of People's Representatives fixed the flag on 2 December 1975. No constitution described it for nearly sixteen years after that.
  • In July 2025 the National Assembly's Standing Committee changed how the national emblem is coloured, and its resolution does not mention the flag.

Why the Laos flag article keeps changing its number

Because Laos has revised its constitution three times, and each revision inserted new articles ahead of the chapter that holds the national symbols.

The National Assembly's own account of its constitutional history sets the sequence out. The first constitution of the Lao PDR was adopted unanimously by the Supreme People's Assembly on the afternoon of 14 August 1991 and promulgated the next day by acting President Phoumi Vongvichit, under Presidential Decree No. 55. It ran to ten chapters and 80 articles, and its Chapter IX covered "เบžเบฒเบชเบฒ, เบญเบฑเบเบชเบญเบ™, เป€เบ„เบทเปˆเบญเบ‡เปเบฒเบเบŠเบฒเบ”, เบ—เบธเบ‡เบŠเบฒเบ”, เป€เบžเบ‡เบŠเบฒเบ” เปเบฅเบฐ เบ™เบฐเบ„เบญเบ™เบซเบฅเบงเบ‡" - language, script, national emblem, national flag, national anthem and capital. The flag was Article 77.

The 2003 revision added a whole chapter on national defence and public security and took the text to eleven chapters and 98 articles. The flag became Article 91.

The 2015 revision added three more chapters, on local people's assemblies, on state audit and on the election committee, reaching fourteen chapters and 119 articles. The flag moved to Article 112.

The third revision was adopted on 20 March 2025 by the second extraordinary session of the ninth National Assembly, by 155 votes to one with no abstentions, and promulgated by President Thongloun Sisoulith on 22 March 2025, under Presidential Decree No. 037. It runs to 122 articles against the previous 119. The National Assembly published a breakdown that accounts for all of them: five articles are entirely new, one on territorial integrity and sovereignty and four on state inspection. Another 62 were amended, and 55 were left untouched. Those add to 122, which means two of the 2015 articles are not carried forward as articles of their own. The flag article is in the untouched 55, and what moved it is where the net gain of three falls. Seven articles follow the flag in both texts, so the whole of the gain sits ahead of the symbols chapter, and the flag slid three places with it.

Constitution Chapters Articles The flag article
1991, the first 10 80 Article 77, in Chapter IX
2003 revision 11 98 Article 91, in Chapter X
2015 revision 14 119 Article 112, in Chapter XIII
2025 revision 14 122 Article 115, in Chapter XIII

The Lao Official Gazette carries all four texts, and the 2025 one marks its own amendments: articles the revision changed have a bracketed "(เบ›เบฑเบšเบ›เบธเบ‡)" beside the number. Articles 113, 114 and 115 - language, emblem and flag - have none. The flag was renumbered in 2025, not rewritten.

What the flag article actually says

The whole of the current provision is one sentence, and has been since 2015. In the gazetted Lao it reads:

"เบ—เบธเบ‡เบŠเบฒเบ” เบ‚เบญเบ‡ เบชเบฒเบ—เบฒเบฅเบฐเบ™เบฐเบฅเบฑเบ” เบ›เบฐเบŠเบฒเบ—เบดเบ›เบฐเป„เบ• เบ›เบฐเบŠเบฒเบŠเบปเบ™เบฅเบฒเบง เปเบกเปˆเบ™ เบ—เบธเบ‡เบžเบทเป‰เบ™เบชเบตเบ„เบฒเบก, เปเบ‚เบšเบชเบตเปเบ”เบ‡ เปเบฅเบฐ เบงเบปเบ‡เป€เบ”เบทเบญเบ™เบชเบตเบ‚เบฒเบงเบขเบนเปˆเป€เบ„เบดเปˆเบ‡เบเบฒเบ‡ เบ‚เบญเบ‡เบ—เบธเบ‡เบŠเบฒเบ”, เบฅเบงเบ‡เบเบงเป‰เบฒเบ‡เบ‚เบญเบ‡เบ—เบธเบ‡เป€เบ—เบปเปˆเบฒเบเบฑเบšเบชเบญเบ‡ เบชเปˆเบงเบ™เบชเบฒเบก เบ‚เบญเบ‡เบฅเบงเบ‡เบเบฒเบง, เบฅเบงเบ‡เบเบงเป‰เบฒเบ‡เบ‚เบญเบ‡เปเบ‚เบšเบชเบตเปเบ”เบ‡ เปเบ•เปˆเบฅเบฐเป€เบšเบทเป‰เบญเบ‡เป€เบ—เบปเปˆเบฒเบเบฑเบšเป€เบ„เบดเปˆเบ‡เปœเบถเปˆเบ‡เบ‚เบญเบ‡เบฅเบงเบ‡เบเบงเป‰เบฒเบ‡เปเบ‚เบšเบชเบตเบ„เบฒเบก เปเบฅเบฐ เบงเบปเบ‡เป€เบ”เบทเบญเบ™เบชเบตเบ‚เบฒเบง เบเบงเป‰เบฒเบ‡เป€เบ—เบปเปˆเบฒเบเบฑเบš เบชเบตเปˆเบชเปˆเบงเบ™เบซเป‰เบฒ เบ‚เบญเบ‡เบฅเบงเบ‡เบเบงเป‰เบฒเบ‡เปเบ‚เบšเบชเบตเบ„เบฒเบก."

Rendered into English, that is: the national flag of the Lao People's Democratic Republic is a flag with a เบ„เบฒเบก-coloured ground, red เปเบ‚เบš and a white moon at the centre of the flag. The width of the flag equals two thirds of its length. The width of each red เปเบ‚เบš equals one half of the width of the เบ„เบฒเบก-coloured เปเบ‚เบš. The white moon is as wide as four fifths of that same width.

Two words are left in Lao there because neither has a clean English equivalent: เบ„เบฒเบก, the colour, and เปเบ‚เบš, the word for the flag's three horizontal divisions. Each gets its own treatment here.

A list of parts and three measurements. There is no clause about what any of it stands for, and no cross-reference to any instrument that might supply one. The Comparative Constitutions Project's English edition of the 2015 text puts the equivalent article this way: "The National Flag of the Lao People's Democratic Republic is dark blue with red edges and a white moon in the middle of the flag."

That translation makes two moves worth naming. The article's own dimension words are เบฅเบงเบ‡เบเบงเป‰เบฒเบ‡ and เบฅเบงเบ‡เบเบฒเบง, the width and the length of the cloth; the English edition uses a different pair of English labels for the same two dimensions, giving "The height of the flag is two-thirds of its width". The ratio is identical either way. And where the Lao says only that the moon is เบเบงเป‰เบฒเบ‡, broad, the English edition supplies a bracketed "[diameter of the]". It also brackets "[the height of]" in the same sentence, though the Lao does say เบฅเบงเบ‡เบเบงเป‰เบฒเบ‡ there. Neither move is wrong. The brackets mark where the edition's English is doing work the Lao does not do word for word, which in the first case is supplying a word and in the second is relabelling one. Both are worth knowing about before quoting the article as though the English were the text.

The edition's word for the coloured parts is worth defending too. The article says เปเบ‚เบš, and every one of the seven senses the SEAlang Library Lao Dictionary lists for it turns on an edge: "edge, brim/brink; edging/border", the border of a circular object, a margin, a boundary. None is band or stripe. So "red edges" is a close rendering rather than a loose one. The catch is that the article uses the same word for the middle, measuring the red pair against เปเบ‚เบšเบชเบตเบ„เบฒเบก, the indigo เปเบ‚เบš, which is the one division on the flag that is not an edge of anything. Next door, Cambodia flies a triband of the same shape, a white device centred on a double-width middle division, in blue and red with the two colours the other way round. The three divisions share one Lao word and English has none that fits all three.

The white circle is a moon in the legal text itself

The constitution calls it a เบงเบปเบ‡เป€เบ”เบทเบญเบ™, and that one word is where much of the confusion starts.

เบงเบปเบ‡เป€เบ”เบทเบญเบ™ is a compound. Its first element, เบงเบปเบ‡, is the shape word: the SEAlang Library Lao Dictionary gives it as a ring, a hoop, and "objects shaped like a circle". Its second element, เป€เบ”เบทเบญเบ™, carries both "moon" and "month". The constitution itself uses each half elsewhere in the same neighbourhood of text. Article 114 of the 2025 text, on the national emblem, describes that emblem as a เบฎเบนเบšเบงเบปเบ‡เบกเบปเบ™, a round figure, and locates the road, paddy, forest and hydroelectric dam เบขเบนเปˆเบเบฒเบ‡เบฎเบนเบšเบงเบปเบ‡เบกเบปเบ™, in the middle of that round figure. Article 117 of the same text dates the national day to เบงเบฑเบ™เบ—เบต 2 เป€เบ”เบทเบญเบ™เบ—เบฑเบ™เบงเบฒ เบ›เบต 1975, using เป€เบ”เบทเบญเบ™ in its calendar sense.

Taken as a whole word, though, เบงเบปเบ‡เป€เบ”เบทเบญเบ™ is a word for the moon in its own right. The only entry the SEAlang Library Lao Dictionary returns for the compound is "moon". So the shape on the flag is not a neutral disc that later tradition decided to read as lunar. The lunar reading is in the constitutional noun.

What is not in the constitutional noun is anything about what the moon is doing there. None of the four constitutional texts says the moon is unity, or the promise of a reunified country, or the full moon over the Mekong, and no other Lao instrument describing the flag has been found. Those readings all attach to a word the constitution supplies and a meaning it does not.

The colour word behaves the same way. The article gives the field as เบชเบตเบ„เบฒเบก, and SEAlang's colour entry for เบ„เบฒเบก is "indigo color", and secondly "the indigo plant, Indigofera hirsuta", the entry going on to name a second species of the same genus. Indigo dye comes from both. English renderings usually flatten that to "dark blue". The flag as flown does read as a dark blue, so nothing is lost visually, but "dark blue" is a translator's word rather than the constitution's, and the constitution attaches no more meaning to เบ„เบฒเบก than it does to the red or to the moon.

What changed in the flag article between 1991 and now

Almost nothing. What did change tightened the geometry, modernised a spelling, or moved a punctuation mark.

The 1991 original, Article 77, reads: "เบ—เบธเบ‡เบŠเบฒเบ”เบ‚เบญเบ‡เบชเบฒเบ—เบฒเบฅเบฐเบ™เบฐเบฅเบฑเบ”เบ›เบฐเบŠเบฒเบ—เบดเบ›เบฐเป„เบ•เบ›เบฐเบŠเบฒเบŠเบปเบ™เบฅเบฒเบง เปเบกเปˆเบ™เบ—เบธเบ‡เบžเบทเป‰เบ™เบชเบตเบ„เบฒเบก, เปเบ‚เบšเปเบ”เบ‡ เปเบฅเบฐ เบงเบปเบ‡เป€เบ”เบทเบญเบ™เบชเบตเบ‚เบฒเบง." It then gives the same three measurements, in wording of its own.

The 2003 revision made six kinds of edit to that provision, at nine points in it, and every one is a matter of precision or of spelling. It changed "เปเบ‚เบšเปเบ”เบ‡", a red edge, to "เปเบ‚เบšเบชเบตเปเบ”เบ‡", an edge of the colour red. It added "เบขเบนเปˆเป€เบ„เบดเปˆเบ‡เบเบฒเบ‡เบ‚เบญเบ‡เบ—เบธเบ‡เบŠเบฒเบ”", at the centre of the national flag, which the 1991 text had left to be inferred. It prepended "เบฅเบงเบ‡เบเบงเป‰เบฒเบ‡เบ‚เบญเบ‡", the width of, to the red edge. It twice made the matching insertion on the other side of the ratio, so that the halves and the fifths are measured against "เบฅเบงเบ‡เบเบงเป‰เบฒเบ‡เปเบ‚เบšเบชเบตเบ„เบฒเบก", the width of the indigo edge, rather than against the edge itself. It modernised the spelling of the word for width, which occurs twice. And in the first of the three ratios it wrote the comparison out in full, as "เป€เบ—เบปเปˆเบฒเบเบฑเบš" where the 1991 text has the shorter "เป€เบ—เบปเปˆเบฒ". The colour word is inserted twice as well, and those three doublings are how six kinds make nine points.

Those are the edits of a drafter tightening a specification and tidying its spelling. Collating the 2003 and 2015 texts character by character turns up exactly one further substantive change, and it is a punctuation mark: 2015 replaced the full stop after the opening description with a comma, merging what 1991 and 2003 both set as two sentences into the one sentence the article is today. Between 2015 and 2025 the same collation returns nothing but spacing. Across thirty-five years and three revisions, the Lao state has adjusted where the moon is said to sit and what the fractions are fractions of, and has never once added a clause saying what any of it is for.

The Laos flag is older than any constitution describing it

By nearly sixteen years. For anything earlier than December 1975 this article has nothing sourced to offer, and the gap is worth naming rather than papering over. A widely repeated account gives the design a named author and a date in 1945, and no Lao government source that could be opened here says so. Searching the National Assembly's own site for เบกเบฐเบซเบฒเบชเบตเบฅเบฒ, เบชเบตเบฅเบฒ เบงเบตเบฅเบฐเบงเบปเบ‡, เบงเบตเบฅเบฐเบงเบปเบ‡ and เบงเบตเบฃเบฐเบงเบปเบ‡, and for เบฅเบฒเบงเบญเบดเบ”เบชเบฐเบฅเบฐ and เบฅเบฒเบงเบญเบดเบ”เบชเบฐเบซเบฅเบฐ, returns three articles between them and not one is about the flag. The same search for เบ—เบธเบ‡เบŠเบฒเบ” returns seventeen, so the index is live and the absence is not an artefact of the search. Three independence-day posts on the National Assembly's site, in 2023 and 2025, do not mention the flag either. What follows is where the state's own account begins, not where the cloth does.

The Lao People's Democratic Republic was proclaimed on 2 December 1975. In a statement published on 11 December 2025 marking its own fiftieth anniversary, the National Assembly describes what the National Congress of People's Representatives did when it opened in Vientiane: it abolished the monarchy, established the People's Democratic Republic, created the Supreme People's Assembly, appointed a head of state, formed a government, and - in the same list, in the same sentence - "เบเปเบฒเบ™เบปเบ”เบ—เบธเบ‡เบŠเบฒเบ”, เป€เบžเบ‡เบŠเบฒเบ” เปเบฅเบฐ เบžเบฒเบชเบฒเบ—เบฒเบ‡เบเบฒเบ™", determined the national flag, the national anthem and the official language.

That is the state's own account of when this flag became the national flag: one line in a founding resolution, alongside the anthem and the language, with no description of the design recorded there and no explanation of it either.

From 2 December 1975 until 15 August 1991 the Lao PDR had no constitution at all. The flag flew over a republic with no fundamental law for fifteen years and eight months, and the first time the state wrote down what the flag looked like was Article 77 of the constitution it finally promulgated in 1991. The 2025 text still marks the anniversary: its Article 120 designates 15 August 1991 as National Constitution Day.

So the sequence runs the opposite way round to the intuitive one. The design was not specified and then adopted. It was adopted, flown for a decade and a half, and then described.

In 2025 the state recoloured the emblem and left the flag alone

Four months after the new constitution took effect, the Standing Committee of the National Assembly turned to the national symbols and issued a resolution.

Resolution No. 203, signed on 30 July 2025 by National Assembly President Saysomphone Phomvihane and published in the Lao Official Gazette that November, is titled "เบกเบฐเบ•เบด เบ„เบฐเบ™เบฐเบ›เบฐเบˆเบณเบชเบฐเบžเบฒเปเบซเปˆเบ‡เบŠเบฒเบ” เบเปˆเบฝเบงเบเบฑเบšเบเบฒเบ™เบ›เบฑเบšเบ›เบธเบ‡เบเบฒเบ™เปƒเบชเปˆเบชเบตเปƒเบชเปˆเป€เบ„เบทเปˆเบญเบ‡เปเบฒเบเบŠเบฒเบ”" - a resolution on improving the colouring of the national emblem. It cites Article 114 of the 2025 constitution and gives its purpose as uniformity in applying that constitution across the country.

It makes two changes, in a document of five articles whose other three hand the job to the Secretariat, direct compliance and set the commencement date. Article 1 agrees to change the emblem's rendering "เบˆเบฒเบเบชเบตเบ”เบณ", from black, to the colours the constitutional article specifies. Article 2 agrees to move the tips of the leaves outward slightly so they do not obscure the image of That Luang. The constitution's own word for that element, at Article 114, is เบฎเบงเบ‡เป€เบ‚เบปเป‰เบฒเบชเบธเบ, ripe ears of rice; the resolution says only เปƒเบšเป„เบกเป‰, leaves.

That is a state paying close attention to how one of its emblems is drawn, in the same year, through the same body, on the authority of the article immediately before the flag article. The flag is not mentioned.

So the silence is not confined to one old article that nobody has revisited. The state returned to its symbols in 2025, in detail, and still wrote down only what they look like.

What the gazette's legislation search can and cannot show

The Lao Official Gazette runs a search over its own legislation, and it is a weaker instrument than it looks, so it is worth describing before reading anything into it. Its records come in two shapes. Some carry the instrument in full: the record for the 2013 Law on the Lao Women's Union carries all fifty-four of its articles. Others carry a title, a few metadata fields and a scanned PDF, and nothing else, and all four constitutions and the 2025 emblem resolution are that kind. That is why searching เบ—เบธเบ‡เบŠเบฒเบ” returns none of the constitutions, even though Article 115 opens with exactly that word. It is also why เป€เบ„เบทเปˆเบญเบ‡เปเบฒเบเบŠเบฒเบ” does return the resolution, whose title carries the word, and does not return the constitution whose Article 114 opens with it. The search cannot show that no flag instrument exists. It can only show what has been titled or typed out.

What it shows is worth having anyway. Nothing at all comes back for เบ—เบธเบ‡เบŠเบฒเบ”, not even a title, and nothing for เป€เบžเบ‡เบŠเบฒเบ”, the national anthem. เบ—เบธเบ‡ on its own returns one row, and it is not about the national flag: it is that Women's Union law, now superseded, which matches because its Article 49 provides that the union "เบกเบตเบ—เบธเบ‡ เปเบฅเบฐ เป€เบ„เบทเปˆเบญเบ‡เปเบฒเบ", has a flag and an emblem, adopted by its own national congress. Existence and provenance, no description and no meaning. The same drafting habit, one level down.

Why the popular Laos flag meanings are not official

Because none of the four Lao constitutions attaches a meaning to any of it, and no other Lao instrument has been found that does.

The blood, the Mekong and the full moon are repeated in much the same terms by encyclopaedias, travel guides and reference sites. What none of them cite is a Lao instrument. The constitution is silent in all four of its versions, and the 2025 resolution is about the emblem.

The honest description of these readings is that they are conventional. They may well be old, they may well be widely held inside Laos, and this article does not claim they are wrong. They are simply not the constitution's, and a page that presents them as the official meaning is attributing to the Lao state a sentence that appears in none of its four constitutional texts.

A flag can be instantly recognisable - the kind of recognition Flag Daily tests with three guesses at the country - while what it means stays a matter of custom rather than law.

Even the National Assembly's own page is a version behind

The National Assembly publishes a page on the country's national symbols, with the emblem, the flag and the anthem side by side.

Its flag paragraph is worth reading closely, because it is not the article currently in force. It gives "เปเบกเปˆเบ™เบ—เบธเบ‡เบžเบทเป‰เบ™เบชเบตเบ„เบฒเบก, เปเบ‚เบšเปเบ”เบ‡ เปเบฅเบฐ เบงเบปเบ‡เป€เบ”เบทเบญเบ™เบชเบตเบ‚เบฒเบง." with a full stop after the moon and no clause placing the moon at the centre of the flag, and it measures the red edges and the moon against "เบ‚เบญเบ‡เปเบ‚เบšเบชเบตเบ„เบฒเบก" rather than against that edge's width. In every substantive respect that is the 1991 original. The one departure is that the page spells the word for width the modern way, เบเบงเป‰เบฒเบ‡, where the 1991 gazette has เบเป‰เบงเบฒเบ‡ - which is exactly what anyone retyping an old text would do, and which the 2003 revision did too. So the page reproduces the text the state adopted in its first constitution rather than the tightened version that replaced it in 2003 and has been in force ever since.

None of this changes what the flag is. It is a small illustration of how the geometry is the durable part. The description has been transcribed, translated, renumbered and lightly rewritten for thirty-five years, and through all of it the one thing nobody has been tempted to add is a meaning.

Frequently asked questions

What does the Laos flag mean?

Officially, nothing. Article 115 of the Lao constitution as revised in 2025 describes the flag - an indigo field with red edges and a white moon at the centre - and fixes three proportions, but assigns no meaning to the red, the blue or the moon. The same has been true of every Lao constitution since 1991. The familiar readings of red as blood shed for independence, blue as the Mekong and the moon as unity are conventional rather than constitutional.

What is the white circle on the Laos flag?

A moon. The constitution's word for it is เบงเบปเบ‡เป€เบ”เบทเบญเบ™, which the SEAlang Library Lao Dictionary glosses simply as "moon", so the lunar reading comes from the legal text itself rather than from folklore. The constitution does not say what the moon represents, and does not connect it to the Mekong or to anything else.

Which article of the Lao constitution describes the flag?

Article 115, since the 2025 revision was promulgated on 22 March 2025. It was Article 112 in the 2015 text, Article 91 in the 2003 text and Article 77 in the original 1991 constitution. The wording has barely changed. The number moved each time a revision inserted new articles ahead of the chapter on national symbols.

Does the Lao constitution say the blue stripe is the Mekong?

No. The constitution names the field's colour as เบชเบตเบ„เบฒเบก, indigo, and says nothing else about it - no river, no prosperity, no explanation of any kind. The Mekong reading is not attributed to any Lao instrument by the sources that repeat it, and none of the four constitutional texts contains it.

When did Laos adopt its current flag?

On 2 December 1975. The National Assembly's own account of that day records that the National Congress of People's Representatives, meeting in Vientiane, abolished the monarchy, established the republic and determined the national flag, the national anthem and the official language. The flag was not written into a constitution until Article 77 of the first Lao constitution, promulgated on 15 August 1991.

Sources